Online Classroom

Saturday, August 26, 2006

Definition

I. Introduction

A. Definition and uses

Definition is a special technique in writing used in clarifying the meaning of a term. Since technical writing uses terms that are simple, concrete, and familiar, it is used in defining special, new, and job-specific terms.

Special terms are terms that simple, concrete, and familiar but have several meanings in different fields or instances. The term “line,” for instance, is has different meanings to engineers, poets, fishermen, and businessmen. It has to be defined operationally in a technical paper.

New terms are those that are used with the introduction of new machines, methods, and the like. The term “laser,” for instance, was used with the introduction of a machine that performs light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation.

Job-specific terms are those that are unique to certain groups of people. For instance, “lava” is unique to volcanologists and the like.

In research report writing, it is used in defining the variables and related terms.

B. Types of definition

According to structure, definitions may be classified into sentence definition and paragraph (amplified) definition. Sentence definitions are further grouped into formal and informal definitions

Formal definitions are those with fixed parts, namely:

1. the term to be defined,
2. the class to where the term belongs, and
3. the differentiating characteristics, or characteristics that distinguish the term from all other terms belonging to the same class.

Informal definitions are those that have no fixed parts. Synonyms, for instance, are considered informal definitions.

Paragraph or amplified definitions are used in amplifying or further clarifying the meaning as stated in sentence definitions.

II. Contents and Organization

The contents for a formal definition are its fixed parts arranged as they are usually written.

The contents of paragraph definition depend upon the methods used in amplifying a sentence definition. “Water cycle,” for example, have “stages” as its contents, which are arranged chronologically.

III. Mechanics

A. Formal definition

In writing formal definitions, the following rules may help:

1. Put the term into a class.
2. The class must be small enough but adequate.
3. Make the differentiating characteristics precise.
4. Do not define a term by mere repetition.
5. Use simpler and more familiar terms.

B. Paragraph or Amplified Definitions

The following methods are used in amplifying sentence definitions:

1. Analysis
2. Cause and Effect
3. Classification
4. Comparison and Contrast (Negative statement)
5. Derivation
6. Description
7. Examples and incidents
8. Process

Induction and Interpretation of Data

I. Introduction

Induction (in logic) is the process of deriving general principles from particular facts or instances. It is a conclusion reached by this process (American Heritage Dictionary). It is a special technique in writing used in the interpretation of data and in making conclusion.
Interpretation of data is the part of technical papers that explains the meaning of the data gathered. In research report, it answers the specific questions.

II. Contents

The contents of induction are general principle and particular facts or instances. In research report, the answers to specific problems or questions are the general principles and the data gathered to answer these questions are particular facts. Moreover, the answer to the research problem or the conclusion is the general principle and the answers to the specific questions are the specific facts or instances.

III. Organization

The data in induction are arranged logically, from specific to general. It should be clarified, however, that, in writing the interpretation of data, generalization may be given first and the particulars as justification next. The thinking process is still induction, not deduction. Unlike induction, deduction consists of premises (major premise and minor premise) and the conclusion (Rorabacher and Dunbar, 202-225).

IV. Mechanics

The following reminders can help make correct induction:

1. Use reliable bases of generalization. Use scientific research methods so as to ensure reliable sources of data. Avoid superstition and personal, popular, emotional, and misleading generalization; these are unreliable bases of generalization (Gorrell and Laird 31-38).

2. Do not generalize beyond what the evidence warrants (Rorabacher and Dunbar, 202-225).

3. Use precise terms in making conclusion (Rorabacher and Dunbar, 202-225)..
You may combine the analysis or presentation of data, also called results, and the interpretation of data, also called discussion (Laflen Online).

Outline of Chapter 4 of a Research Report with combined Analysis and Interpretation of Data on the research problem “Are the attitudes of Metro Manila residents towards imported goods positive?”

Chapter 4
RESULTS
Introduction
I. Quality
.......A. Analysis
.............1. Total number of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
.............2. Weighted average of each group of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
.............3. Hypothesis test results
......B. Interpretation
.............1. Answer to the specific question on quality based on the hypothesis test results
.............2. Evidence: weighted average of each group of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
.............3. Connection between the findings and the theoretical framework
.............4. Similarities or differences of findings of study to findings of other studies reviewed in Chapter 2
II. Price
......A. Analysis
............1. Total number of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
............2. Weighted average of each group of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
............3. Hypothesis test results
......B. Interpretation
............1. Answer to the specific question on price based on the hypothesis test results
............2. Evidence: weighted average of each group of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
............3. Connection between the findings and the theoretical framework
............4. Similarities or differences of findings of study to findings of other studies reviewed in Chapter 2

III. Availability
......A. Analysis
............1. Total number of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
............2. Weighted average of each group of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
............3. Hypothesis test results
......B. Interpretation
............1. Answer to the specific question on availability based on the hypothesis test results
............2. Evidence: weighted average of each group of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
............3. Connection between the findings and the theoretical framework
............4. Similarities or differences of findings of study to findings of other studies reviewed in Chapter 2


References

Gerber, Robert. Data Interpretation. Robert Gerber Home Page. Retrieved Aug. 24.
.........http://www.petech.ac.za/ robert/DataInterpr.htm

Gorrell, Robert M. and Charlton Laird. Modern English Workbook. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: .........Prentice Hall, Inc. 1966.

“Induction” American Heritage Dictionary in Answers.com.
Laflen, Angela. “Results: Interpretation of Data.” Online Writing Lab: Purdue University. Aug.-.........Sept. 2001. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/ workshops/hypertext/reportw/bodyresults2.html
Rorabacher, Louise Elizabeth, Georgia Dunbar and Clement Dunbar Assignments in exposition. .........12th .ed. NY : Addison-Wesley, 1996.

“Writing Assignment: Induction Essay.” Towson.edu Home Page. Retrieved January 31, 2006.
..........http://www.towson.edu/ ~duncan/inducess.html


Induction and Interpretation of Data

I. Introduction

Induction (in logic) is the process of deriving general principles from particular facts or instances. It is a conclusion reached by this process (American Heritage Dictionary). It is a special technique in writing used in the interpretation of data and in making conclusion.
Interpretation of data is the part of technical papers that explains the meaning of the data gathered. In research report, it answers the specific questions.

II. Contents

The contents of induction are general principle and particular facts or instances. In research report, the answers to specific problems or questions are the general principles and the data gathered to answer these questions are particular facts. Moreover, the answer to the research problem or the conclusion is the general principle and the answers to the specific questions are the specific facts or instances.

III. Organization

The data in induction are arranged logically, from specific to general. It should be clarified, however, that, in writing the interpretation of data, generalization may be given first and the particulars as justification next. The thinking process is still induction, not deduction. Unlike induction, deduction consists of premises (major premise and minor premise) and the conclusion (Rorabacher and Dunbar, 202-225).

IV. Mechanics

The following reminders can help make correct induction:

1. Use reliable bases of generalization. Use scientific research methods so as to ensure reliable sources of data. Avoid superstition and personal, popular, emotional, and misleading generalization; these are unreliable bases of generalization (Gorrell and Laird 31-38).

2. Do not generalize beyond what the evidence warrants (Rorabacher and Dunbar, 202-225).

3. Use precise terms in making conclusion (Rorabacher and Dunbar, 202-225)..
You may combine the analysis or presentation of data, also called results, and the interpretation of data, also called discussion (Laflen Online).

Outline of Chapter 4 of a Research Report with combined Analysis and Interpretation of Data on the research problem “Are the attitudes of Metro Manila residents towards imported goods positive?”

Chapter 4
RESULTS
Introduction
I. Quality
.......A. Analysis
.............1. Total number of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
.............2. Weighted average of each group of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
.............3. Hypothesis test results
......B. Interpretation
.............1. Answer to the specific question on quality based on the hypothesis test results
.............2. Evidence: weighted average of each group of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
.............3. Connection between the findings and the theoretical framework
.............4. Similarities or differences of findings of study to findings of other studies reviewed in Chapter 2
II. Price
......A. Analysis
............1. Total number of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
............2. Weighted average of each group of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
............3. Hypothesis test results
......B. Interpretation
............1. Answer to the specific question on price based on the hypothesis test results
............2. Evidence: weighted average of each group of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
............3. Connection between the findings and the theoretical framework
............4. Similarities or differences of findings of study to findings of other studies reviewed in Chapter 2

III. Availability
......A. Analysis
............1. Total number of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
............2. Weighted average of each group of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
............3. Hypothesis test results
......B. Interpretation
............1. Answer to the specific question on availability based on the hypothesis test results
............2. Evidence: weighted average of each group of SA, A, U, D, SD responses
............3. Connection between the findings and the theoretical framework
............4. Similarities or differences of findings of study to findings of other studies reviewed in Chapter 2


References

Gerber, Robert. Data Interpretation. Robert Gerber Home Page. Retrieved Aug. 24.
.........http://www.petech.ac.za/ robert/DataInterpr.htm

Gorrell, Robert M. and Charlton Laird. Modern English Workbook. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: .........Prentice Hall, Inc. 1966.

“Induction” American Heritage Dictionary in Answers.com.
Laflen, Angela. “Results: Interpretation of Data.” Online Writing Lab: Purdue University. Aug.-.........Sept. 2001. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/ workshops/hypertext/reportw/bodyresults2.html
Rorabacher, Louise Elizabeth, Georgia Dunbar and Clement Dunbar Assignments in exposition. .........12th .ed. NY : Addison-Wesley, 1996.

“Writing Assignment: Induction Essay.” Towson.edu Home Page. Retrieved January 31, 2006.
..........http://www.towson.edu/ ~duncan/inducess.html


Saturday, August 12, 2006

MLA Citation Guide
Introduction
This guide is based on the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, 6th ed. (Modern Language Society, 2003. Works Cited items are listed alphabetically at the end of the research paper. In the body of the paper these items are referred to using Parenthetical references.
For additional examples, please refer to the MLA Handbook.
Book
(one author)
Bibliography:
Johnson, Charles Richard. Middle Passage. New York:
.....Atheneum, 1990.

In-Text:
(Johnson 176)
Book
(two to three authors)
Bibliography:
Leakey, Mary D. and Louis S. B. Leakey. Some String Figures?? from
.....North East Angola. Lisboa: Museu do Dundo, 1949.
In Text:
(Leakey and Leakey 12)
For more authors, use:
(Leakey et al.)

Anthology
Bibliography:
McNally, John, ed. Humor Me: An Anthology of Humor
.....by Writers of Color. Iowa City: U of Iowa P, 2002.
In-Text:
(McNally xv)

Work in an Anthology
Bibliography:
James, Henry. "The Friends of the Friends." The Norton
.....Book of Ghost Stories. Ed. Brad Leithauser. New
.....York: Norton, 1994. 40-60.
In-Text:
(James 47)
Encyclopedia Article
Work Cited:
“Magna Carta.” The New Encyclopedia Britannica. 15th ed.
.....1998.
In-Text:
("Magna Carta")
Journal Article
Bibliography:
Myerson, Joel. ?A Calendar of Transcendental Club Meetings.?
.....American Literature 44 (1972): 197-207.
In-Text:
(Myerson 199)
Magazine Article

Bibliography:
Cook, Mariana. ?Cousin Kay.? Victoria. Nov.
.....2001: 27-28.

In-Text:
(Cook 28)

Newspaper Article
Bibliography:
Johnston, David Cay. "Got Game? Got Old Game?" New
.....York Times 11 July 2003, late ed., F1+.

In-Text:
(Johnston F3)

Review

Bibliography:
Barth, Melissa E. Rev. of The Summons, by John Grisham.
.....Magill Book Reviews 1 Nov. 2002: 221.

In-Text:
(Barth)
Work of Art (photograph of)
Bibliography
Ingres, Jean Auguste Dominique. Apotheosis of Homer. Musee
.....du Louvre, Paris. Gardner's Art Through the Ages.
.....10th ed. By Helen Gardner. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace,
.....1996. Plate 22.

In-Text:
(Ingres)

Television Program
Bibliography:
“Popularity of Fur on Rise Again.” Narr. Virginia Cha.
....Sunday Today. NBC. WNBC, New York. 9 Feb.
....2003.

In-Text:
(“Popularity of Fur”)

Sound Recording (CD)
Bibliography:
Copland, Aaron. Long Time Ago: American Songs. Saint
.....Paul Chamber Orch. Cond. Hugh Wolff. Teldec,
.....1994.

In-Text:
(Copland)

Web Home Page
Bibliography:
The Edith Wharton Society. Ed. Donna Campbell.
.....5 Aug. 2003. Gonzaga U. 14 Aug. 2003
.
In-Text:
(Edith)

Document from a Website
Bibliography:
Oates, Joyce Carol. ?The Magnanimity of Wuthering Heights.?
.....Critical Inquiry 9 (1982): 435-449. Celestial Timepiece:
.....A Joyce Carol Oates Home Page. Ed. Randy Souther.
.....2003. U of San Francisco. 14 Aug. 2003
.
In-Text:

(Oates)

Item from a Library Database
Bibliography:
Clark, Zsuzsanna. ?From Saturday-Night Poetry to Big Brother.?
.....New Statesman 21 July 2003: 32. Academic Search Premier.
.....EBSCOHost. Ohio State U Libs., Columbus. 14 Aug. 2003.
In-Text:
(Clark)

E-Mail Communication
Bibliography:
Grisham, John. E-mail to the author. 14 July 2002.
In-Text:
(Grisham)

Source:
MLA Citation Guide. University Libraries. Ohio State University. March 8, 2006. http://library.osu.edu/sites/guides/mlagd.php


Notes
Arrange the items on your reference list alphabetically by author, interfiling books, articles, etc.
Doublespace all lines.
Indent the second and following lines 5 spaces (or one half inch).
If no author is given, start with the title.
Abbreviate the names of all months except May, June, and July.
If the paging of a magazine or newspaper article is continued elswhere in the issue, include only the first page followed by a plus sign (ex. 25+.).
If the encyclopedia does not arrange its articles alphabetically, treat the encyclopedia article as if it were a book article. Specific volume and page numbers are cited in the text, not in the list of references.
Gale Reference Book: cite the original source being reprinted as shown under Book, Journal Article, Newspaper or Magazine Article, etc. The example shows a Magazine Article. Then include the citation information for the reference book.
Websites: include the title of the web page, the name of the entire web site, the organization that posted it (this may be the same as the name of the website). Also include the full date the page was created or last updated (day, month, year if available) and the date you looked at it.
Internet Magazine Articles: Include:
The name of the database (underlined) and the company that created it and its home webpage;
The full date of the article (day, month, year if available) and the date you looked at it;
If you are citing a journal instead of a magazine, include the volume (and issue number) and date as shown under the Journal Style above.
The library or other organization (and its location) that provided you with access to the database.
As for page numbers, different databases will provide different information. Include the range of pages (ex. 25-28.); or the starting page followed by a hyphen, a blank space, and a period (ex. 64- .); or the total number of pages or paragraphs (ex. 12 pp. or 33 pars.). If no page information is given, then leave it out.
The rules concerning a title within a title are not displayed here for purposes of clarity. See the printed version of the manual for details.
For documents and situations not listed here, see the printed version of the manual.


Source:
Delaney, Robert. MLA Citation Style: MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers, 6th edition in C.W. Post Campus, B. Davis Schwartz Memorial Library. Jan. 3, 2006. http://www.liu.edu/CWIS/CWP/library/workshop/cita.htmml